Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;7(1):e000923. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000923

Table 1.

Baseline demographic comparison of the AC and AP cohorts

Entire cohort (N=26) Full (n=4) Prophylactic+AP (n=10) Prophylactic (n=8) None (n=4)
Demographics and clinical variables
Age (years) 26 (16–51) 24 (22–26) 25 (16–57) 29 (20–51) 24 (16–28)
Male (%) 26 (100) 4 (100) 10 (100) 8 (100) 4 (100)
BMI (kg/m2) 24.4 (19.7–45.6) 24.4 (19.9–30.9) 26.3 (19.7–45.6) 22.3 (18.9–47.0) 24.4 (23.6–28.1)
Penetrating (%) 24 (92) 4 (100) 9 (90) 9 (100) 3 (75)
ISS 22 (9–38) 21 (10–34) 22 (9–34) 18 (9–38) 27 (9–43)
AIS score of abdomen 4 (3–5) 4 (3–5) 4 (3–5) 4 (3–5) 3 (3–4)
Trauma exsanguination protocol (%) 17 (71), n=24 3 (75) 6 (67), n=9 5 (71), n=7 3 (75)
Operative management
Surgical intervention (%) 24 (92) 4 (100) 9 (90) 9 (100)* 3 (75)
Postoperative outcomes
IVC filter (%) 5 (19) 0 (0) 2 (20) 2 (22) 1 (25)
Mortality (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

All values are n (%) or median (IQR).

There was no significant difference between the treatment groups with regard to baseline demographics.

*One patient required surgical intervention, but the retroperitoneum was not explored.

AC, anticoagulation; AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale; AP, antiplatelet; BMI, body mass index; ISS, Injury Severity Score; IVC, inferior vena cava.