Table 4.
Overall performance on multilevel event extraction compared with the state-of-the-art methods with gold standard entities.
| Method | Trigger recognition (%) | Event extraction (%) | |||||
|
|
Precision | Recall | F1 score | Precision | Recall | F1 score | |
| EventMinea | 70.79 | 81.69 | 75.84 | 62.28 | 49.56 | 55.20 | |
| SSLa,b | 72.17 | 82.26 | 76.89 | 55.76 | 59.16 | 57.41 | |
| CNNa,c | 80.92 | 75.23 | 77.97 | 60.56 | 56.23 | 58.31 | |
| mdBLSTMa,d | 82.79 | 76.56 | 79.55 | 90.24 | 44.50 | 59.61 | |
| RLe+KBsa,f | N/Ag | N/A | N/A | 63.78 | 56.81 | 60.09 | |
| DeepEventMineh | N/A | N/A | N/A | 69.91 | 55.49 | 61.87 | |
| HANNh,i | N/A | N/A | N/A | 63.91 | 56.08 | 59.74 | |
| Our modelh | 82.20 | 78.25 | 80.18 | 72.26 | 55.23 | 62.80j | |
aPipeline model.
bSSL: semisupervised learning.
cCNN: convolutional neural network.
dmdBLSTM: bidirectional long short-term memory with a multilevel attention mechanism and dependency-based word embeddings
eRL: reinforcement learning.
fKB: knowledge base
gN/A: not applicable.
hJoint model.
iHANN: hierarchical artificial neural network.
jThe best value compared with baselines.