Table 4.

Factors associated with treatment uptake in bivariate analysis among women in a prospective study in Migori, Kenya, between February and November 2018 (n=551).

Characteristic			Treatment uptake		No treatment uptake		Crude risk ratio (95% CI)
Age (years), mean (SD)			36.4 (10.6)		35.5 (10.6)		1.00 (1.00-1.01)
Education level, n (%)
	Primary school or less	224 (48.6)		237 (51.4)		—a
	Some secondary school	54 (60)		36 (40)		1.23 (1.02-1.50)
Number of children, mean (SD)			4.5 (2.8)		4.1 (2.7)		1.02 (1.00-1.05)
Work outside of home, n (%)
	No	110 (46.6)		126 (53.4)		—
	Yes	168 (53.3)		147 (46.7)		1.14 (0.96-1.36)
Missed work to attend screening, n (%)
	No	165 (45.8)		195 (54.2)		—
	Yes	113 (59.2)		78 (40.8)		1.29 (1.10-1.52)
Told by family to attend screening, n (%)
	No	96 (46.2)		112 (53.8)		—
	Yes	182 (53.1)		161 (46.9)		1.15 (0.96-1.37)
Previous cervical cancer screening, n (%)
	No	228 (48.5)		242 (51.5)		—
	Yes	50 (61.7)		31 (38.3)		1.27 (1.05-1.55)
Currently using family planning or contraception, n (%)
	No	151 (49.5)		154 (50.5)		—
	Yes	124 (52.5)		112 (47.5)		1.06 (0.90-1.25)
	Not sexually active	2 (22.2)		7 (77.8)		0.45 (0.13-1.53)
Frequency of mobile phone use, n (%)
	<7 days a week	18 (38.3)		29 (61.7)		—
	7 days a week	212 (51.5)		200 (48.5)		1.34 (0.92-1.95)

^aReference category.