Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;35(6):901–915. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00427

Table 4. Studies Assessing the Association between Hair Dye Use and Carcinogenic Risk.

study study type publication year original nation cases/controls carcinogenic risk association analysis ref
Gago-Dominguez case-control study 2001 USA 897/897 bladder cancer 2.1-fold (P = 0.04) (94)
Kogevinas case-control study 2006 Spain 152/166 bladder cancer OR, 0.80 (0.50–1.50) (95)
Thun epidemiologic study 1994 USA NA bladder cancer RR, 0.56 (0.32–0.99) (96)
breast cancer RR, 0.95 (0.83–1.05)
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma RR, 0.95 (0.74–1.23)
Hodgkin’s lymphoma RR, 0.55 (0.23–1.36)
multiple myeloma RR, 1.05 (0.75–1.47)
Henley comment 2001 USA NA bladder cancer RR, 1.08 (0.84–1.38) (97)
Hartge case-control study 1982 USA 2982/5782 bladder cancer RR, 1.00 (0.90–1.20) (98)
Ros case-control study 2012 The Netherlands 1385/4754 bladder cancer OR, 0.87 (0.65–1.18) (101)
Koutros case-control study 2011 USA 61/102 bladder cancer OR, 3.30 (1.20–8.90) (105)
Gago-Dominguez case-control study 2003 USA 33/12a bladder cancer OR, 2.90 (1.20–7.50) (106)
37/17a bladder cancer OR, 2.50 (1.04–6.10) (94)
Turati meta-analysis 2014 Italy 3657/5962 bladder cancer RR, 0.92 (0.77–1.09) (100)
Boice case-control study 1995 USA 528/2628 breast cancer OR, 1.08 (0.87–1.30) (111)
Koenig case-control study 1991 USA 398/790 breast cancer OR, 0.80 (0.60–1.10) (112)
Cook case-control study 1999 USA 315/393b breast cancer RR, 1.10 (0.90–1.30) (115)
204/138b breast cancer RR, 1.90 (1.40–2.50) (115)
Zheng case-control study 2002 USA 608/609 breast cancer OR, 0.90 (0.70–1.20) (113)
Nasca case-control study 1992 USA 1617/1617 breast cancer OR, 1.04 (0.90–1.21) (114)
Heikkinen case-control study 2015 Finland 6567/21598 breast cancer OR, 1.23 (1.11–1.36) (116)
Petro-Nustas case-control study 2002 Jordan 100/100 breast cancer OR, 8.62 (3.33–22.28) (117)
Eberle prospective study 2019 USA NA breast cancer HR, 1.45 (1.10–1.90) (119)
Nasca case-control study 1980 USA 118/233 breast cancer OR, 4.50 (1.20–15.78) (118)
Gera meta-analysis 2018 UK NA breast cancer RR, 1.19 (1.03–1.37) (1)
Xu meta-analysis 2021 China NA breast cancer OR, 1.07 (1.01–1.13) (120)
Grodstein prospective study 1994 USA NA hematopoietic cancer RR, 0.90 (0.70–1.20 (136)
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma RR, 1.10 (0.80–1.60)
Hodgkin’s lymphoma RR, 0.90 (0.40–2.10)
multiple myeloma RR, 0.40 (0.20–0.90)
Miligi case-control study 1999 Italy 165/828 Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 0.70 (0.50–1.10) (138)
134/828 multiple myeloma OR, 0.80 (0.50–1.20)
260/828 leukemia OR, 0.90 (0.70–1.30)
Benavente case-control study 2005 Spain 574/616 hematopoietic cancer OR, 1.20 (0.90–1.70) (139)
Tavani case-control study 2005 Italy 446/1295 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 1.03 (0.73–1.44) (142)
158/1295 Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 0.68 (0.40–1.18)
141/1295 multiple myeloma OR, 1.17 (0.70–1.97)
Wong case-control study 2010 USA 649/1298 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 0.93 (0.75–1.16) (147)
Zahm case-control study 1992 USA 385/1432 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 1.50 (1.10–2.20) (148)
70/1432 Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 1.70 (0.70–4.00)
72/1432 multiple myeloma OR, 1.80 (0.90–3.70)
56/1432 leukemia OR, 1.00 (0.30–2.60)
Zhang case-control study 2009 USA 601/717 follicular lymphoma OR, 1.90 (1.10–3.30) (149)
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 1.30 (1.00–1.80) (150)
Zhang case-control study 2009 USA 4461/5799 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 1.30 (1.10–1.40) (151)
Guo case-control study 2009 USA 261/247c non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 1.46 (1.10–1.95) (152)
132/177c OR, 1.03 (0.75–1.42)
Cantor case-control study 1988 USA 622/1245 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma OR, 2.00 (1.30–3.00) (153)
Herrinton interview study 1994 USA women multiple myeloma OR, 1.00 (0.70–1.40) (140)
men OR, 1.50 (0.75–2.90)
Koutros case-control study 2009 USA 175/679 multiple myeloma OR, 0.80 (0.50–1.10) (141)
Mele case-control study 1995 Italy 254/1161 leukemia OR, 1.50 (0.60–3.70) (137)
Cantor case-control study 1988 USA 578/1245 leukemia OR, 1.80 (1.10–2.70) (153)
Chen case-control study 2006 USA 272/418d testicular germ cell tumor OR, 1.50 (1.00–2.20) (163)
83/180d OR, 1.70 (1.00–2.80)
189/238d OR, 1.70 (1.10–2.60)
a

33/12 and 37/17 indicate subjects with the NAT2 slow acetylation phenotype and those with the CYP1A2 slow phenotype, respectively.

b

315/393 and 204/138 indicate subjects using the single hair dye method and those using two or more methods, respectively.

c

261/247 and 132/177 indicate subjects using hair dye before 1980 and those using hair dye in and after 1980, respectively.

d

272/418, 83/180, and 189/238 indicate all children, boys, and girls, respectively. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; RR, relative ratio; HR, hazard ratio.