Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 10;2015(8):CD007082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007082.pub2

Baird 1999.

Methods Prospective, randomized, single‐centre trial
Participants N = 300, age 1.5 to 81 years, scheduled for elective day‐case surgery
Interventions Type of LMA: LMA Classic
Early removal ‐ The LMA removed by anaesthetist in operating theatre and replaced by appropriately sized Guedel airway and oxygen delivered by Hudson mask
Late removal ‐ The LMA left in situ with oxygen delivered through modified T piece ‐ removed by awake patients themselves or nurse under supervision in PACU. Patient was considered awake if he or she could open eyes and mouth
Outcomes Coughing
Desaturation defined as oxygen saturation < 96%
Airway obstruction
Notes No premedication
Anaesthesia induced with propofol and fentanyl, maintained on N2O + O2 + Isoflurane
Patients breathed spontaneously during the procedure
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Patients assigned to one of two groups by random allocation. Randomization was carried out by "envelope randomization in the operating theatre"
COMMENT ‐ There is no description of method used for generation of random sequence such as shuffling of envelope or coin tossing
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "No patient was aware of their randomization status, and envelopes were opened after induction of anaesthesia and towards the end of surgery"
COMMENT ‐ It is not clear whether the sequence was concealed from the investigators as the authors do not mention that the envelopes were opaque
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Of outcome assessor to all outcomes High risk "It was not possible to double‐blind the study, as the observers needed to be able to see patients' airway in order to record the incidence of complications"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk COMMENT ‐ Though no explicit statement by authors, the outcomes are reported for 300 patients who were randomized
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk COMMENT ‐ Though no explicit statement, the outcomes mentioned in methodology have been reported