Nunez 1998.
| Methods | Prospective, randomized, single‐centre trial | |
| Participants | N = 66, ASA I‐II, scheduled for elective urological, orthopaedic and minor breast surgery Exclusion criteria ‐ age < 18 and > 80 years Pathology of neck, upper respiratory or upper alimentary tract pathology, those at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents |
|
| Interventions | Early removal ‐ The LMA was removed while the patient was still deeply anaesthetized at the end of the operation, immediately after discontinuing the volatile agent and nitrous oxide Late removal ‐ The LMA was removed once the patient regained consciousness spontaneously and was able to respond to the verbal command to open the mouth |
|
| Outcomes | Laryngospasm Coughing Desaturation Airway obstruction |
|
| Notes | Induction ‐ propofol 2.5 to 3.0 mg/kg + alfentanil 10 to 20 mcg/kg Maintenance ‐ isoflurane 1% to 2% in nitrous oxide and O2 on spontaneous respiration LMA size 4 for females and size 5 for males |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Allocated randomly to one of two groups by blocked randomization (in blocks of 10)" |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | COMMENT ‐ No information on the method of allocation concealment |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Of outcome assessor to all outcomes | High risk | Not done |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | COMMENT ‐ Outcomes reported for all 66 patients randomized |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | COMMENT ‐ Though no explicit statement, the outcomes mentioned in methodology have been reported |