Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 10;2015(8):CD007082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007082.pub2

Pappas 2001.

Methods Randomized observer‐blinded study
Participants N = 123, age 4 months to 7 years, ASA I‐II, scheduled for infra‐umbilical surgery
4 groups ‐ Group 1: isoflurane anaesthesia and early removal of the LMA; Group 2: isoflurane anaesthesia and late removal of the LMA; Group 3: sevoflurane anaesthesia and early removal of the LMA; Group 4: sevoflurane anaesthesia and late removal of the LMA
Interventions Type of LMA: LMA Classic
Early removal ‐ The LMA was removed at twice the age‐adjusted MAC end‐tidal concentration of isoflurane/ sevoflurane
Late removal ‐ The LMA was removed when patients were awake i.e. in the presence of spontaneous eye opening, grimacing, coughing, and purposeful movement of extremities without any physical stimulation
Outcomes Desaturation
Airway reactivity
Vomiting
Bronchospasm
Overall airway adverse event
Notes Induction & maintenance ‐ according to study groups
Spontaneous breathing
Supplemental regional analgesia
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Assigned to one of the four groups using computer‐generated random sequence"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk COMMENT ‐ No description of method of allocation concealment
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Of outcome assessor to all outcomes Low risk "A research nurse, blinded to the anaesthetic drug and technique, recorded all study variables"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk COMMENT ‐ 123 patients randomized and four excluded after randomization (3.3% dropout). Authors have done available case analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk COMMENT ‐ Though no explicit statement, the outcomes mentioned in methodology have been reported