Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 10;2015(8):CD007082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007082.pub2

Park 2012.

Methods Randomized, prospective, parallel‐group study
Participants Enrolled = 92, Randomized = 85
Excluded after enrolment and before randomization = 7
Age: 2 to 6 years, ASA I‐II, elective inguinal hernia repair or hydrocelectomy as outpatients
Interventions Type of LMA: LMA Classic
Early removal ‐ The LMA was removed during anaesthesia with 2.2% sevoflurane
Late removal ‐ The LMA was removed when patients met the recovery criteria, including facial grimace, spontaneous eye opening, and purposeful arm movement
Outcomes Laryngospasm defined as respiratory effort without airflow despite chin lift and jaw thrust, thus requiring assisted positive pressure ventilation
Coughing
Desaturation (SpO2 < 95%)
Breath holding defined as apnoea longer than 5 seconds
Excessive secretions requiring pharyngeal suction after LMA removal
LMA biting (no removal of LMA due to biting, even when the patient was fully awake)
Vomiting
Upper airway obstruction requiring use of airway adjuncts or airway support for both chin lift and jaw thrust
Notes No premedication
Induction & maintenance ‐ sevoflurane, spontaneous respiration
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Randomly assigned to either anaesthesia group or the awake group using a computer‐generated random numbers table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk COMMENT ‐ No description of method of allocation concealment
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Of outcome assessor to all outcomes Low risk "One investigator was aware of group allocation and was responsible for anaesthesia emergence and LMA removal. The other investigators observed the recovery process and recorded data. The data analyst was blinded to study group allocation"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk COMMENT ‐ All the 85 patients randomized completed the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk COMMENT ‐ All the outcomes mentioned in methods have been reported in results