Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;13(24):7256–7263. doi: 10.1039/d2sc02277j

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d2sc02277j-u1.jpg
Entry Variation from “standard conditions” Yieldb/[%]
1 None 76 (71)c
2 TBADT instead of NaDT 59
3 L1, L2 or L4 instead of L3 26, 36, 15
4 L5 or L6 instead of L3 0
5 K3PO4 instead of K2HPO4 42
6 Na2HPO4 instead of K2HPO4 27
7 MeCN instead of acetone 11
8 DCM instead of acetone Trace
9 DMSO instead of acetone 0
10 4 equivalents of valeraldehyde were used 70
11 1 equivalent of ethyl acrylate were used 59
12 Absence of NaDT, Ni or light 0
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (1 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), 3 (0.2 mmol), Ni(L3)Br2 (10 mol%), NaDT (2 mol%), K2HPO4 (0.4 mmol) in acetone (0.2 M) at 30 °C under irradiation of LEDs (10 W, λ = 390 nm) for 24 hours.

b

GC yield with n-dodecane as internal standard.

c

Isolated yield.