Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, cutoff determination value (* indicates sensitivity > cutoff determination value, which indicates differentiating hypohydrated vs. euhydrated subjects), positive and negative predictive value, number of total diagnosed using respective WUT criteria, and distribution of subjects based on urine specific gravity (USG)>1.020 and urine osmolality >700 mOsmol. Gray shaded area indicates subjects defined as likely or very dehydrated (bold-faced text) or euhydrated for matching with number of WUT criteria (3, 2, 1, 0) met

Urine specific gravity
# of WUT markers	Sensitivity	Specificity	Cutoff determination value	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value	# of total diagnosed using WUT criteria	Distribution of subjects based on USG>1.020 threshold
							Hypohydration	Euhydration
3	0.088	0.964	0.833	61.5%	38.5%	13	8	5
2	0.659	0.572	0.299*	49.1%	50.9%	106	52	54
1	0.340	0.428	0.763	28.7%	71.3%	87	25	62
0	0.938	0.123	0.773*	26.1%	73.9%	23	6	17
Total						229	91	138
Urine osmolality (mOsmol)
# of WUT markers	Sensitivity	Specificity	Cutoff determination value	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value	# of total diagnosed using WUT criteria	Distribution of subjects based on urine osmolality >700 mOsmol threshold
							Hypohydration	Euhydration
3	0.079	0.956	0.850	53.8%	46.2%	13	7	6
2	0.652	0.570	0.306*	49.5%	50.5%	103	51	52
1	0.348	0.430	0.750	29.4%	70.6%	85	25	60
0	0.937	0.126	0.768*	26.1%	73.9%	23	6	17
Total						224	89	135