Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 20;14(4):508–517. doi: 10.1177/19417381211055399

Table 1.

Relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs for the network comparisons on total pregnancy and live birth rates

Outcomes No. of Studies Sample Size RR 95% CI
Pregnancy rate
 CET vs MICT 1 129 1.04 (0.33-3.25)
 CET vs NON-EX 2 651 27.81 (13.34-57.97)
 CET vs RT 1 126 2.22 (0.74-6.61)
 HICT vs HIIT 1 127 1.20 (0.35-4.04)
 HICT vs MICT 1 128 0.21 (0.06-0.70)
 HICT vs NON-EX 2 520 5.55 (2.37-13.00)
 HIIT vs MICT 1 131 0.17 (0.05-0.59)
 HIIT vs NON-EX 2 553 4.63 (1.94-11.02)
 MICT vs NON-EX 3 650 26.67 (11.18-63.63)
 MICT vs RT 1 127 2.12 (0.65-6.97)
 RT vs NON-EX 2 534 12.54 (5.58-28.19)
Live birth rate
 CET vs MICT 1 129 0.22 (0.01-3.52)
 CET vs NON-EX 2 651 2.20 (0.93-5.18)
 CET vs RT 1 126 0.45 (0.06-3.26)
 HICT vs HIIT 1 127 0.35 (0.05-2.56)
 HICT vs MICT 1 128 0.15 (0.01-2.45)
 HICT vs NON-EX 2 520 1.55 (0.68-3.52)
 HIIT vs MICT 1 131 0.44 (0.02-10.70)
 HIIT vs NON-EX 2 553 4.38 (0.72-26.64)
 MICT vs NON-EX 3 650 10.05 (0.71-141.35)
 MICT vs RT 1 127 2.04 (0.08-49.85)
 RT vs NON-EX 2 534 4.92 (0.82-29.52)

CET, combined aerobic and resistance exercise training; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; HICT, high-intensity continuous training protocol; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; NON-EX, nonintervention control; RT, resistance training.