Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;13(24):7347–7354. doi: 10.1039/d2sc02205b

Optimization studiesa.

graphic file with name d2sc02205b-u1.jpg
Entry Additive Oxidant Solvent Yieldb (%)
1 PivOH AgOAc THF 48
2 PivOH AgOAc 1,4-Dioxane 26
3 PivOH AgOAc DCE Trace
4 PivOH AgOAc MeOH NDc
5 PivOH AgOAc PhMe 41
6 PivOH AgOAc t-AmOH 68
7 PivOH AgF t-AmOH 40
8 PivOH Ag2CO3 t-AmOH 30
9 PivOH Ag2O t-AmOH 15
10 Zn(OAc)2 AgOAc t-AmOH 35
11 CsOAc AgOAc t-AmOH 69
12 CsOPiv AgOAc t-AmOH 76
13 NaOAc AgOAc t-AmOH 70
14 HOAc AgOAc t-AmOH 65
15d PivOH AgOAc t-AmOH 75
16e PivOH AgOAc t-AmOH 40
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.05 mmol), 2a (0.065 mmol), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (5 mol%), additive (0.5 equiv.), oxidant (2.3 equiv.), and solvent (1.0 mL), at 120 °C under air for 12 h.

b

Isolated yield.

c

Not detected.

d

Under N2.

e

AgSbF6 (20 mol%) was used.