Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;13(24):7304–7309. doi: 10.1039/d2sc01992b

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d2sc01992b-u1.jpg
Entry Cu Ligand Base Solvent Yieldb (%)
1 IMesCuCl PPh3 LiOtBu Toluene 58
2 IPrCuCl PPh3 LiOtBu Toluene 26
3 CuBr PPh3 LiOtBu Toluene No reaction
4 IMesCuCl LiOtBu Toluene Trace
5 IMesCuCl BINAP LiOtBu Toluene 67
6 IMesCuCl PCy3 LiOtBu Toluene 29
7c IMesCuCl BINAP LiOtBu Toluene 57
8d IMesCuCl BINAP LiOtBu Toluene 69
9d IMesCuCl BINAP KOtBu Toluene 58
10d IMesCuCl BINAP NaOMe Toluene 42
11d,e IMesCuCl BINAP LiOtBu Toluene 89
12d,e IMesCuCl BINAP LiOtBu PhCl 76
13d,e IMesCuCl BINAP LiOtBu MeCN 43
14 d , e , f IMesCuCl BINAP LiO t Bu Toluene 91
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), B2pin2 (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), catalyst (5 mol%), ligand (10 mol% for monodentate ligand, 5 mol% for bidentate ligand), base (1.5 equiv.), solvent (1 mL), 90 °C, 12 h.

b

Isolated yields.

c

BINAP (2.5 mol%).

d

BINAP (7.5 mol%).

e

2a (0.35 mmol).

f

100 °C.