Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;12(3):453–462. doi: 10.1177/19418744221083182

Table 4.

Secondary clinical, cost & utilization outcomes—difference-in-difference analysis

DID estimator
Estimator a 95% CI P-value FDR-adjusted P-value
Clinical Lower Upper
In-hospital death (%) b .80 .08 7.82 .85 1.00
In-hospital complication (%) b POA not yes
Any .42 .16 1.10 .08 .24
Sepsis 1.47 .10 21.53 .78 1.00
Pneumonia .74 .03 19.84 .86 1.00
UTI c - - - -
Delirium .14 .02 .79 .03 .12
AKI .72 .11 4.77 .73 1.00
Thrombosis c (DVT/PE) - - - -
Cost and utilization
>=2 consultants b .77 .46 1.28 .31 .74
Total direct cost d .97 .86 1.10 .68 1.00
Lab cost d 1.39 1.15 1.69 <.001 .012
Imaging cost d 1.07 .92 1.24 .38 .76
Imaging use e .12 .03 .52 .004 .024
Rx/IV therapy cost d 1.00 .69 1.44 .99 1.00

DID: difference-in-difference; POA: present on admission; UTI: urinary tract infection; AKI: acute kidney injury; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; PE: pulmonary embolism; Rx/IV: medication and/or intravenous therapy; NH: neurohospitalist; GEE: generalized estimating equation.

aRatio of OR (Ref: Pre-NH, stroke control)

bIf ratio < 1, intervention significantly reduced complication rate compared to controls.

cModel did not converge due to low event rate

dIf ratio < 1, intervention significantly reduced cost compared to controls. Main log gamma model.

eIf ratio < 1, intervention resulted in significantly lower odds of having any imaging during hospital encounter compared to controls. Hurdle model.