Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2022 Jun 8;16:908330. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.908330

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2022 Schilling, Gerum, Metzner, Maier and Krauss.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PMC Copyright notice

Effect of SR on speech recognition (high frequency hearing loss). Same analysis as shown in Figure 7 for high frequency hearing loss. (A) The plots show the relative accuracy of the trained neural network as a function of the hearing loss (red dashed line: chance level). The high frequency hearing loss lead to different effects (10–50 dB, 10 dB steps, frequency range of HL: above 4,000 Hz). (B) The relative accuracy as a function of the noise has no clear maximum above the value for no added noise (nearly no SR). Furthermore, a second local maximum occurs. (C) The best relative improvement does not significantly increase over 10%. (D) Optimal noise level as a function of hearing loss shows similar behavior as for the hearing loss in the speech relevant frequency range (cf. Figure 7).