Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 11;119(10):157–164. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0109

Table 2. Analysis of the primary endpoints.

Change after one year*1 per group Group comparison
Endpoint Team-basedform of care Standard care Team-based − Standard
Observedmean value (SD) Observedmean value (SD) Estimated difference[95% confidence interval] p value D
DAS28 −0.14(1.07) 0.04(1.15) −0.19[−0.36; −0.02]*2 < 0.001*4
EQ-5D-5L 0.02(0.21) 0.01 (0.23) 0.02[−0.02; 0.05]*3 0.285

*1 final value – initial value

*2 estimated using a mixed linear model in der per protocol population with adjustment for patient sex,

baseline DAS28 score, type of rheumatoid disease, and center (random effect)

*3 estimated using a linear mixed model in intention-to-treat population with adjustment for patient age and sex,

EQ-5D-5L score at baseline, type of rheumatic disease, and center (random effect)

*4 p value from test for non-inferiority, p = 0.025 in test for superiority

DAS28, Disease Activity Score with 28 joints; EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol in 5 dimensions and 5 response levels; D, direction of the estimated difference;

SD, standard deviation; ↑ indicates advantage of team-based form of care.