Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;2022(6):CD015017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub3

Risk of bias for analysis 2.7 Quality of life (mental component) at up to 28 days.

Study Bias
Randomisation process Deviations from intended interventions Missing outcome data Measurement of the outcome Selection of the reported results Overall
Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement
TOGETHER 2022 Low risk of bias Centralized web‐ and text message‐based randomization. There are no baseline differences that would suggest a problem with randomization. Low risk of bias Both participants and those delivering the intervention were not aware of the intervention received and the analysis was appropriate. Low risk of bias Data for this outcome were available for all randomized participants. Low risk of bias Knowledge of intervention received could have affected outcome measurement. But outcome assessors were not aware of the intervention received. Low risk of bias The protocol was prospectively registered and the outcome in the journal publication was reported as registered. Low risk of bias Due to low risk of bias in all domains.