| Study |
Bias |
| Randomisation process |
Deviations from intended interventions |
Missing outcome data |
Measurement of the outcome |
Selection of the reported results |
Overall |
| Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| TOGETHER 2022 |
Low risk of bias |
Centralized web‐ and text message‐based randomization. There are no baseline differences that would suggest a problem with randomization. |
Low risk of bias |
Both participants and those delivering the intervention were not aware of the intervention received and the analysis was appropriate. |
Some concerns |
Data for this outcome were not available for the number of participants as prespecified in the trial protocol, however it seems unlikely that missing data depended on its true value. |
Low risk of bias |
Outcome assessors were not aware of the intervention received. Knowledge of intervention received could not have affected outcome measurement. |
Low risk of bias |
The protocol was prospectively registered and the outcome in the journal publication was reported as registered. |
Some concerns |
Due to insufficient information on reason for missing number of participants that should have been evaluated for this outcome (according to trial protocol). |
| Vallejos 2021 |
Low risk of bias |
Randomization was performed by an team member who was not part of any other part of the study using a computer‐based programme. There was no baseline imbalance that would suggest a problem with randomization. |
Low risk of bias |
Both participants and those delivering the intervention were not aware of the intervention received and the analysis was appropriate. |
Low risk of bias |
Data for this outcome were available for all randomized participants. |
Low risk of bias |
Outcome assessors were not aware of the intervention received. Knowledge of intervention received could not have affected outcome measurement. |
Low risk of bias |
The protocol was prospectively registered and the outcome in the journal publication was reported as registered. |
Low risk of bias |
Due to low risk of bias in all domains. |
