Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2021 Jul 28;34(8):1910–1925. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00181

Table 3.

Molecular Formulae, Ring Double Bond Equivalents (RDBE), Retention Times (RT), As Well As Observed m/z and Mass Error (Δm in ppm) for Relevant Compounds in This Studya

compound neutral formula RDBE instrument method RT (min) ion observed m/zm in ppm)
C-CTX-1/-2 C62H92O19 17 2 13.24 [M−H2O+H]+ 1123.6177 (−2.1)
C-CTX-3/-4 C62H94O19 16
C-CTX-1/2-GlcA (1) C68H100O25 19 2 8.57 [M−H] 1315.6510 (+2.2)
C-CTX-1/2-GlcA (2) C68H100O25 19 2 9.13 [M−H] 1315.6509 (+2.1)
C-CTX-3/4-GlcA (1) C68H102O25 18 3 8.99 [M−H] 1317.6697 (+4.5)
C-CTX-3/4-GlcA (2) C68H102O25 18 3 9.22 [M−H] 1317.6693 (+4.2)
C-CTX-3/4-GlcA (3) C68H102O25 18 3 9.36 [M−H] 1317.6692 (+4.1)
C-CTX-3/4-GlcA (4) C68H102O25 18 3 9.62 [M−H] (+4.1)
a

Data for C-CTX-1/-2 and its GlcA metabolites were obtained from a sample collected after 60 min incubation of L. campechanus (RSN1) liver microsomes with C-CTX-1/-2 stock solution and analyzed using LC-HRMS Instrument Method 2. Data for the four C-CTX-3/-4-GlcA products were produced by reduction of RSN1-generated C-CTX-1/-2-GlcA with sodium borohydride and analyzed using Instrument Method 3. The neutral formula and RDBE for C-CTX-3/-4 is shown for comparison, but LC-HRMS information is omitted since these were not investigated during this study.