Table 3.
Comparison with other studies
| Author | Dataset | Method | Original channel | Channel selection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julkunen et al.[46] | Private dataset | Global coherence | 60 | No |
| Shriram et al.[34] | Karunya University | Energy distribution and coherence-based changes | 18 | No |
| Busonera et al.[50] | Sleep disorder center of Cagliari and Parma with | Spectral coherence | 19 | No |
| Abbaszadeh et al.[51] | University Hospital of Freiburg, Germany | Global coherence | 6 | No |
| Narasimhan et al.[47] | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Partial directed coherence | 115.9±31.3 | No |
| An et al.[45] | Shanghai Jiao Tong University | Partial directed coherence | 128-256 | Yes (1 channel) |
| Ravish et al.[30] | CHB-MIT, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital | Coherence and phase synchrony | 23-26 | Yes (4 channels) |
| This study | CHB-MIT | Spectral coherence | 23-24 | Yes (4-10 channels) |
CHB-MIT: Children’s Hospital Boston – Massachusetts Institute of Technology