Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD005399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005399.pub3

Crumrine 1989.

Methods RCT, parallel
Participants Total randomised: 73
 Age range of patients = 2 to 18 years. Mean age for cinromide group = 7.38 (± 3.65), mean age for placebo group = 7.93 (± 4.87). All patients had Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, although level of intellectual disability was not stated
 Patients could be on no more than 3 other AEDs
 Baseline period = 6 weeks. Treatment period = 18 weeks
Interventions Cinromide versus placebo
Outcomes The primary statistical analysis of seizure frequency compared the changes from the baseline period (6 weeks) to the treatment period (12 weeks for most patients) in the cinromide and placebo groups
Global evaluations at weeks 12, 18 and 24 were also compared
Notes Numbers used in data analysis = 56
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Although it states that participants were randomly assigned, information is not given about how randomisation was achieved
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Although it describes the trial as "double‐blind", there is insufficient information as to how blinding was achieved.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Although it describes the trial as "double‐blind", there is insufficient information as to how blinding was achieved.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Study attrition reported but reasons unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Very few P values reported
Other bias High risk Study was terminated early when it became clear to the funder that cinromide was not effective