Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD005399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005399.pub3

Sachdeo 1999.

Methods RCT, parallel
Participants Total randomised: 98
 Age range: topiramate group = 2 to 29 years (mean 11.2 years), placebo group = 2 to 42 years (mean 11.2 years). All patients had Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, although the article does not make specific mention of the level of intellectual disability in this population
 All patients were receiving 1 to 3 concomitant AEDs
 Baseline period = 4 weeks. Followed by a 3‐week titration phase and an 8‐week maintenance phase
Interventions Topiramate versus placebo
Outcomes Primary efficacy determinants = (a) reduction in average monthly seizure rate for all seizure types combined; or (b) each component of a compound variable consisting of % reduction in drop attacks (tonic + atonic) and the parental global evaluation of seizure severity
 Secondary efficacy = (a) reduction in average monthly rate of major seizures (drop attacks + TC); (b) the % of patients considered to be treatment responders defined as those with a >= 50%, >= 75% or 100% reduction from baseline for drop attacks, major seizures and all seizures
Notes Numbers used in data analysis = 98
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was computer‐generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Coded, opaque containers
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants and study personnel "remained blinded to codes"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants and study personnel "remained blinded to codes"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unequal dropout rates across groups; reasons for dropouts not given
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes discussed were reported. There is no evidence to suggest outcomes were selectively reported
Other bias Unclear risk Funded by pharmaceutical company but no other evidence to suggest unclear risk of bias