| Methods |
RCT, parallel |
| Participants |
Total randomised: 98
Age range: topiramate group = 2 to 29 years (mean 11.2 years), placebo group = 2 to 42 years (mean 11.2 years). All patients had Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, although the article does not make specific mention of the level of intellectual disability in this population
All patients were receiving 1 to 3 concomitant AEDs
Baseline period = 4 weeks. Followed by a 3‐week titration phase and an 8‐week maintenance phase |
| Interventions |
Topiramate versus placebo |
| Outcomes |
Primary efficacy determinants = (a) reduction in average monthly seizure rate for all seizure types combined; or (b) each component of a compound variable consisting of % reduction in drop attacks (tonic + atonic) and the parental global evaluation of seizure severity
Secondary efficacy = (a) reduction in average monthly rate of major seizures (drop attacks + TC); (b) the % of patients considered to be treatment responders defined as those with a >= 50%, >= 75% or 100% reduction from baseline for drop attacks, major seizures and all seizures |
| Notes |
Numbers used in data analysis = 98 |
| Risk of bias |
| Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Randomisation was computer‐generated |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Coded, opaque containers |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Participants and study personnel "remained blinded to codes" |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Participants and study personnel "remained blinded to codes" |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Unequal dropout rates across groups; reasons for dropouts not given |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
All outcomes discussed were reported. There is no evidence to suggest outcomes were selectively reported |
| Other bias |
Unclear risk |
Funded by pharmaceutical company but no other evidence to suggest unclear risk of bias |