Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;2022(6):CD013285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013285.pub2

Summary of findings 3. Exercise compared with underwater PEP (uPEP; also known as bubble PEP) for people with cystic fibrosis.

Exercise compared with uPEP for people with cystic fibrosis
Patient or population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Settings: outpatient
Intervention: exercise (cycle ergometer constant effort 1/2 W/kg) 1 x 30‐minute session per week
Comparison: uPEP 1 x 30‐minute session per week
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of Participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
uPEP Exercise
Pulmonary function: absolute change FEV1 % predicted This outcome was not measured.  
Change in VO2 peak during maximal exercise This outcome was not measured.  
Quality of life: change in CFQ‐R score This outcome was not measured.  
Adverse effects
 
Follow‐up: 2 weeks
There was no difference between the exercise group and the uPEP group in terms of peak SaO2 (%) or desaturation.
 
13
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa,b
 
 
Participant preference: VAS test and a questionnaire to evaluate acceptability of technique to participants
 
Follow‐up: 2 weeks
The exercise test was perceived by participants as more fatiguing but was also considered more amusing. 13
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa,b
 
The study gave very limited information on the scale used or the results. We have reported results reported directly from the paper.
Adherence This outcome was not measured.  
Need for extra antibiotics (days) This outcome was not measured.  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CFQ‐R: Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire ‐ Revised; CI: confidence interval; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; SaO2: arterial oxygen saturation; uPEP: underwater positive expiratory pressure; VAS: visual analogue score; VO2 max: maximal oxygen consumption. 
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded twice due to high or unclear risk of bias across all domains in this single cross‐over study.
bDowngraded once due to imprecision caused by very low participant numbers.