Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 6;2022:baac009. doi: 10.1093/database/baac009

Table 3.

Concordance of Reactome pathway-based perturbation effect predictions with experimental evidence

Reactome pathway name TP TN FP total (FP-WD) FN Accuracy (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Precision (%)
Reactome pathway identifier C MPB C MPB C MPB C MPB C MPB C MPB C MPB C MPB
68 875 Mitotic Prophase 23 21 1 0 1 (1) 4 (3) 1 1 92 81 96 95 50 NA 96 84
69 242 S Phase 17 14 2 2 0 (0) 1 (1) 6 8 76 64 74 64 100 67 100 93
69 620 Cell Cycle Checkpoints 42 42 5 5 2 (2) 2 (2) 6 6 85 85 88 88 71 71 95 95
195 721 Signaling by WNT 36 29 2 1 0 (0) 2 (1) 11 17 78 61 77 63 100 33 100 94
453 279 Mitotic G1-G1/S phases 40 16 10 23 29(6) 13 (3) 10 37 56 44 80 30 26 64 58 55
1 227 986 Signaling by ERBB2 36 33 4 4 0 (0) 0 (0) 9 12 82 76 80 73 100 100 100 100
1 257 604 PIP3 activates AKT signaling 185 173 0 0 14 (7) 17 (10) 1 10 93 87 99 95 NA NA 93 91
3 700 989 Transcriptional Regulation by TP53 156 157 25 16 16(12) 26 (13) 60 58 70 67 72 73 61 38 91 86
5 673 001 RAF/MAP kinase cascade 48 45 1 1 0 (0) 3 (3) 0 0 100 94 100 100 100 NA 100 94
5 693 567 HDR through Homologous Recombination (HRR) or Single Strand Annealing (SSA) 36 43 1 0 4 (2) 5 (2) 7 0 77 90 84 100 20 NA 90 90
Total 619 573 51 52 66 (30) 73 (38) 111 149
Average
± SD
81
± 13
75
± 16
85
± 10
78
± 22
70
± 33
62  ± 24 92
± 13
88
± 12

TP = true positive; TN = true negative; FP = false positive; FP-WD = false positive—wrong direction; FN = false negative; C = curator-based predictions; MPB = MP-BioPath-based predictions.