Table 3.
Perceived level of influence of the training modalities among participants reporting each type of training experience %(95%CI).1
| Not at all influential | Minimally influential/ Influential | Very/ Extremely influential | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learned in clinic from other residents or faculty (n=1,302) | 0.9% (0.4-1.6) | 31.8% (29.3-34.4) | 67.3% (64.7-69.8) |
| Formal training in continuity clinic (n=933) | 2.7% (1.7-3.8) | 40.5% (37.5-43.8) | 56.8% (53.6-60.0) |
| Formal in-person training (n=751) | 5.3% (3.8-7.2) | 39.5% (36.0-43.2) | 55.1% (51.5-58.7) |
| Conference (n=663) | 9.1% (6.9-11.2) | 46.3% (42.5-50.1) | 44.6% (40.9-48.4) |
| Online ROR training (n= 726) | 8.4% (6.4-10.4) | 52.8% (49.0-56.4) | 38.8% (35.8-42.6) |
| Grand rounds(n=527) | 12.3% (9.5-15.1) | 52.2% (47.8-56.5) | 35.5% (31.4-39.6) |
1.
Differences in percentages were deemed significant in the absence of overlapping confidence intervals.