Table 3.
Distribution of nature and duration of lockdowns.
| Cities/Provinces | Hard Lockdowna |
Mild Lockdowna |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (in days) | % Days of outbreak | Duration (in days) | % Days of outbreak | |
| Bangkok | 123 | 79% | 32 | 21% |
| Gauteng | 28 | 31% | 62 | 69% |
| Ho Chi Minh City | 69 | 64% | 39 | 36% |
| Jakarta | 0 | 0% | 160 | 100% |
| London | 0 | 0% | 190 | 100% |
| Manila City | 0 | 0% | Followed a bubble strategy called NCR+ | |
| New Delhi | 43 | 65% | Follows locality-wise lockdown strategy | |
| New York City | 0 | 0% | 181 | 100% |
| Singapore | 30 | 70% | 13 | 30% |
| Tokyo | 0 | 0% | 86 | 100% |
a
Hard lockdowns were defined as an all stay at home restriction with only essential business open whilst a mild lockdown was defined whereby work and travel were permitted with valid reasons.