Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;2022:2844880. doi: 10.1155/2022/2844880

Table 3.

In vitro antibacterial activities of the essential oils (EOs) of Salvia officinalis and Mentha suaveolens via the disc-diffusion method. Chloramphenicol and DMSO were used as a positive and negative control, respectively.

S. officinalis EO (10 μl/disc) M. suaveolens EO (10 μl/disc) Chloramphenicol (30 μg/disc) 10% DMSO (10 μl/disc)
Gram-positive bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus 28.0 ± 0.6 31.6 ± 0.6a 30.8 ± 0.6
Staphylococcus epidermidis 25.1 ± 0.5 27.5 ± 0.3a 28.7 ± 0.3
Enterococcus faecalis 20.2 ± 0.4 22.7 ± 0.4a 23.4 ± 0.3
Listeria monocytogenes 25.0 ± 0.3 29.6 ± 0.4a 27.5 ± 0.2
Bacillus cereus 26.8 ± 0.4 30.4 ± 0.3a 29.0 ± 0.2

Gram-negative bacteria
Escherichia coli 18.6 ± 0.3 21.7 ± 0.2a 28.1 ± 0.3
Salmonella typhimurium 16.3 ± 0.2 18.7 ± 0.1a,b 21.0 ± 0.3
Klebsiella pneumoniae 17.6 ± 0.2 19.4 ± 0.2a,b 23.1 ± 0.2
Proteus mirabilis 17.1 ± 0.3 21.3 ± 0.1a,b 25.3 ± 0.5
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8.1 ± 0.5b 9.2 ± 0.1b

Values are the mean zone of inhibition (mm) ± SD. (–), undetected activity. a,bP < 0.05 vs. S. officinalis EO and chloramphenicol, respectively.