Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;2022:3655225. doi: 10.1155/2022/3655225

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Covariate/subgroup Studies, n Sensitivity (95% CI) P value Specificity (95% CI) P value
Number of patients included 0.05 0.85
 >50 2 0.88 (0.80–0.96) 0.85 (0.65–1.00)
 ≤50 5 0.89 (0.83–0.96) 0.90 (0.76 - 1.00)
Ethnicity 0.15 0.23
 Asian 3 0.90 (0.82–0.98) 0.94 (0.84–1.00)
 The rest 4 0.89 (0.82–0.96) 0.81 (0.64–0.98)
Treatment 0.07 0.30
 Surg, Surg+Cx, Surg+Cx+RTx 4 0.89 (0.82–0.95) 0.93 (0.84–1.00)
 Surg 3 0.90 (0.82–0.98) 0.79 (0.59–0.99)
Study 0.91 0.02
 Retro 6 0.89 (0.85–0.93) 0.89 (0.83–0.95)
 Pro 1 0.47 (0.23–0.71)
Analysis 0.77 (0.60–0.95) 0.80 0.81
 LB 1
 PB 6 0.86 (0.58–1.00)
Image analysis 0.93 (0.85–1.00) 0.80 0.81
0.88 (0.82– 0.90 (0.77–1.00)
0.94)
Qualitative 1 0.93 (0.85–1.00) 0.86 (0.58–1.00)
Quantitative 6 0.88 (0.82–0.94) 0.93 (0.77–1.00)

PB: patient-based; LB: lesion-based; Pro: prospective; Retro: retrospective; Surg: surgery; Cx: chemotherapy; RTx: radiotherapy.