Table 1.
Diagnostic methods to measure MNA; definition, advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect methods for diagnosis of MNA
| Methods | Definition | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | |||
| Directly observed therapy | Sightly supervised drug administration by healthcare personnel or caregiver | High reliability | Expensive Time-consuming Loss of independence |
| Wireless observed therapy [23] | Ingestible sensor system embedded in pills. | High reliability | Expensive Gastrointestinal discomfort Skin reaction to ingestion detector |
| Therapeutic drug monitoring [15, 27, 24–35] | Investigate the discrepancies between expected and observed drug blood levels. | Easily available at every transplant centre | Not available for every drug Reflect a short interval of time |
| Indirect | |||
| Pill counts [36] | Healthcare personnel, caregivers and pharmacists can count pill and monitor drug refills | Inexpensive | Patients can hide pills Requires a single distribution system Time-consuming |
| Electronic monitoring [37–42] | Use of microprocessors embedded in the medication container | Do not assure drug ingestion Uncomfortable device Expensive |
|
| Self-reported questionnaire [14, 43, 44] | Questions to determine whether and how often the patients did not correctly take the prescribed medication | Easy, inexpensive and can be done during routine visits | Can underestimate intentional MNA |