Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;15(7):1231–1252. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac008

Table 4.

Comparison of frequently used commercially available diagnostic approaches for hantavirus disease

Diagnostic test Antigen type/hantavirus detected Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Comments References
ELISA DOBVHTNVPUUVSEOVANDVSNV 95–97 94–99 Combination of IgG test and IgM capture test is recommended [224, 225]
IFA DOBVHTNVPUUV 98 91 Used as a confirmation test in Europe [227]
Immunoblot assay DOBVHTNVPUUVSEOV 96 100 Used as a confirmation test in Europe [226]
Rapid immunochromatographic IgM antibody tests DOBVHTNVPUUVSNV 80–93 96 Point-of-care test [228, 229]
(Real-time)-PCR Facilitates sequencing of the viral genome and the detection of novel hantaviruses 92–98 80–98 Time to test positivity <24 h Only useful in early viremic stage of infection [265, 266]