Table 1. Characteristics of lab-developed direct RT-qPCR compared to conventional RT-qPCR.
(a) Agreement of the conventional RT-qPCR and lab-developed RT-qPCR | |||
Lab-developed RT-qPCR | Conventional RT-qPCR | ||
Positive | Negative | Total | |
Positive | 111 | 0 | 111 |
Negative | 5 | 654 | 659 |
Total | 116 | 654 | 770 |
(b) The qualitative results of conventional RT-qPCR and lab-developed RT-qPCR by agreement statistics | |||
Agreement Coefficient | 0.974 (CI = 0.952–0.994) | ||
Accuracy | 99.35% (CI = 99.49–99.68%) | ||
Sensitivity | 95.69% (CI = 90.23–98.59%) | ||
Specificity | 100.00% (CI = 99.44–100.00%) | ||
Positive predictive value | 100% | ||
Negative predictive value | 99.24% (CI = 98.23–99.68%) | ||
AUC ratio | 0.978 (CI = 0.957–1.000) | ||
McNemar’s Test (p-value) | 0.65 (p < 0.001) |