Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;14(11):4624–4633. doi: 10.18632/aging.204095

Table 1. Characteristics of lab-developed direct RT-qPCR compared to conventional RT-qPCR.

(a) Agreement of the conventional RT-qPCR and lab-developed RT-qPCR
Lab-developed RT-qPCR Conventional RT-qPCR
Positive Negative Total
Positive 111 0 111
Negative 5 654 659
Total 116 654 770
(b) The qualitative results of conventional RT-qPCR and lab-developed RT-qPCR by agreement statistics
Agreement Coefficient 0.974 (CI = 0.952–0.994)
Accuracy 99.35% (CI = 99.49–99.68%)
Sensitivity 95.69% (CI = 90.23–98.59%)
Specificity 100.00% (CI = 99.44–100.00%)
Positive predictive value 100%
Negative predictive value 99.24% (CI = 98.23–99.68%)
AUC ratio 0.978 (CI = 0.957–1.000)
McNemar’s Test (p-value) 0.65 (p < 0.001)