Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;142(7):1661–1668. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04005-9

Table 4.

Adherence of digital templating according to planner’s experience

Offset option1 Perfect match − 1 offset option  + 1 offset option − 2 offset options  + 2 offset options
Group 1 373 (70.1%) 92 (17.3%) 55 (10.3%) 11 (2.1%) 1 (0.2%)
Group 2 241 (69.7%) 56 (16.2%) 43 (12.4%) 4 (1.2%) 2 (0.6%)
Group 3 67 (77.9%) 11 (12.8%) 5 (5.8%) 2 (2.3%) 1 (1.2%)
Stem size2 Perfect match  ± 1 size  ± 2 sizes  ± 3 sizes and more Offset option not correct
Group 1 121 (22.7%) 141 (26.5%) 85 (16.0%) 26 (4.9%) 159 (29.9%)
Group 2 70 (20.2%) 119 (34.4%) 41 (11.8%) 11 (3.2%) 105 (30.3%)
Group 3 17 (19.8%) 31 (36.0%) 13 (15.1%) 6 (7.0%) 19 (22.1%)
Cup3 Perfect match  ± 1 size  ± 2 sizes  ± 3 sizes and more
Group 1 163 (30.6%) 220 (41.4%) 93 (17.5%) 56 (10.5%)
Group 2 110 (31.8%) 159 (46.0%) 61 (17.6%) 16 (4.6%)
Group 3 25 (29.1%) 44 (51.2%) 16 (18.6%) 1 (1.2%)

1p = 0.298

2p = 0.074

3p = 0.076