Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;269(7):3706–3712. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-10995-2

Table 3.

Covariance analysis of duration of BoNTa efficacy

Model summary R R2 Adjusted R2 Standard error Durbin–Watson
0.449 0.2013 0.148 2,621,350 0.387
ANOVA Sum of squares Degrees of freedom Mean squares F p value
Regression 283,77 11 2579,785 3754  < 0.001*
Residual 112,692,227 164 687,148
Total 141,069,858 175
B Standard error Beta t p value
Doses − 0.259 0.059 − 0.409 − 4.369  < 0.001*
Years of treatment − 0.390 0.319 − 0.100 − 1.224 0.223
Age 0.299 0.158 0.159 1.895 0.060
Sex − 1.261 4.357 − 0.022 − 0.289 0.773
IncobotulinumtoxinA − 14.766 6.112 − 0.196 − 2.416 0.017*
AbobotulinumtoxinA − 8.999 10.071 − 0.147 − 0.894 0.373
Cervical dystonia 34.674 10.334 0.530 3.355  < 0.001*
Hemifacial spasm 5.649 5.633 0.080 1.003 0.317
Oromandibular dystonia 30.590 13348 0.180 2292 0023*
Focal dystonia 32.156 12.226 0.327 2.630 0.009*
Sialorrhea − 5.314 9.164 − 0.045 − 0.580 0.563

As a categorical, non-dichotomous variable, type of toxin was inserted in the statistical model as a dummy variable with onabotulinumtoxin-A as the reference level (thus not present in the table)

Likely, type of disease was inserted as a dummy variable with blepharospasm as the reference level (thus not present in the table)

BoNT botulinum toxin