Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;198(7):612–621. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01944-z

Table 3.

Outcomes of studies evaluating sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection and radiotherapy

Author (years) Study type SLN Median follow-up (months) Type of RT 5‑year LRR (in %) 5‑year DFS (in %) 5‑year OS (in %)
SLN+ RT
ACOSOG Z0011 (2011) [2]a P 446 75.6 (62.4–84.0) WBRT, High tangent, nodal RT 1.6 83.9 92.5
ACOSOG Z0011 (2017) [3]a P 446 111.6 (82.8–124.0) WBRT, High tangent, nodal RT NA 80.2b 86.3b
Setton (2011) [21] R 326 55.0 (1.0–158.0) 98.0c,d 95.0c 91.0c
302 Supine or prone WBRT, High tangents, nodal RT 99.0c,d 96.0c 92.0c
Yi (2013) [22] R 188 66.0 (14.4–134.4) WBRT NA 95.7 94.3
121 64.8 (14.4–134.4) NA 99.0 95.9
Wang (2014) [23] R 1269e 73.0 (24.0–143.0) Not specified NA NA NA
393 0.0 95.6 89.4
Morrow (2017) [8] P 663 29.0 (2.0–76.0) Supine or prone WBRT, nodal RT NA 93.0 95.0
484 37.0 (12.0–75.0) 1.0 NA NA
Kittaka (2018) [7] P 189 36.0 (10.0–64.0) WBRT ± High tangent 1.1f 96.8f NA
183 NA NA NA
Jung (2019) [24] R Not specified NA NA NA
707 1.1 97.7 NA
LISEN trialg P 131 44.0 (6.0–85.0) WBRT 1.5 93.6 96.9

SLN sentinel lymph node dissection, P prospective, R retrospective, RT radiotherapy, LRR locoregional recurrence, DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival, WBRT whole breast radiotherapy, NA not available

aSLN group

b10 years

c4 years

dRegional control

eSLND + ALND

f3 years

gSLN + RT group