Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 7;269(7):3713–3722. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-10996-1

Table 2.

User-experiences of patients

Item (Very) Easy n (%) Neutral n (%) (Very) Difficult n (%) N*
Placing the mask on my face was 23 (82.1) 4 (14.3) 1 (3.6) 28
Handling the spirometer was 26 (92.8) 1 (3.6) 1 (3.6) 28
Starting a VC test in the app was 30 (96.8) 1 (3.2) 0 (0) 31
Performing a VC test was 29 (87.9) 3 (9.1) 1 (3) 33
Judging whether the test was performed correctly was 26 (78.8) 3 (9.7) 3 (9.7) 32
Item (Totally) Agree n (%) Neutral n (%) (Totally) Disagree n (%) N*
The spirometer is user-friendly 31 (93.9) 1 (3) 1 (3) 33
The spirometry app was user-friendly 30 (90.9) 3 (9.1) 0 (0) 33
The spirometer is appropriate for home-monitoring of respiratory function 30 (90.9) 3 (9.1) 0 (0) 33
I would like to monitor my respiratory function from home for care purposes 30 (93.8) 2 (6.3) 0 (0) 32
I know how to perform a VC test 33 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 33
I believe that my VC test at home is performed just as well as a usual VC test in the clinic 24 (72.8) 4 (12.1) 5 (15.1) 33
I am unsure about performing the VC test correctly in the absence of a healthcare professional 2 (6.5) 4 (12.9) 25 (80.6) 31
Performing VC tests at home is burdensome 2 (6.3) 2 (6.3) 28 (87.5) 32

VC vital capacity

*Missing data are due to patients answering “not applicable/ no opinion”