Table 3.
Have no second-child intention | Have second-child intention | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | P | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N = 540 | N = 130 | No second-child intention vs. have second-child intention | No second-child intention vs. have second-child intention | |||
Age, years, women | ||||||
<35 | 267 | 85 | Ref | 0.002 | Ref | 0.002 |
≥35 | 273 | 45 | 1.86 (1.27–2.77) | 1.92 (1.27–2.91) | ||
First child's age, years | ||||||
≤ 2 | 84 | 30 | 1.41 (0.52–3.80) | 0.023 | 1.97 (0.70–5.52) | 0.017 |
3–6 | 371 | 90 | 2.40 (0.94–6.10) | 3.12 (1.19–8.17) | ||
≥7 | 56 | 7 | Ref | Ref | ||
The percentage of child-related expense (%) a | ||||||
<10 | 370 | 105 | Ref | 0.054 | Ref | 0.117 |
10–30 | 118 | 15 | 1.47 (0.91–2.37) | 1.26 (0.77–2.07) | ||
≥30 | 32 | 3 | 2.86 (1.17–6.95) | 2.62 (1.05–6.53) | ||
Fertility-encouraged government policy | ||||||
No | 448 | 97 | Ref | 0.053 | Ref | 0.039 |
Yes | 88 | 33 | 0.58 (0.37–0.91) | 0.61 (0.38–0.98) | ||
Children's educational barriers | ||||||
No | 172 | 60 | Ref | 0.003 | Ref | 0.038 |
Yes | 364 | 70 | 1.81 (1.23–2.68) | 1.55 (1.03–2.33) |
aThe percentage of child expense (%) = 100% × Annual child-related expense/Annual household income.
The sum does not necessarily equal the sample size for all variables because of missing data.
Pearson's χ2 test.