Table 4.
Have no third-child intention | Have third-child intention | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | P | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N = 184 | N = 21 | No third-child intention vs. have third-child intention | No third-child intention vs. have third-child intention | |||
Age, years, women | ||||||
<35 | 62 | 8 | Ref | 0.700 | Ref | 0.713 |
≥35 | 121 | 13 | 1.20 (0.47–3.05) | 1.24 (0.39–3.98) | ||
First child's age, years | ||||||
≤ 2 | 7 | 1 | 0.99 (0.41–2.40) | 0.992 | 0.86 (0.21–3.46) | 0.837 |
3–6 | 88 | 11 | 0.87 (0.10–7.71) | 0.62 (0.05–8.63) | ||
≥7 | 89 | 12 | Ref | Ref | ||
The percentage of children expense (%) a | ||||||
<10 | 24 | 5 | Ref | 0.067 | Ref | 0.080 |
10–30 | 63 | 11 | 1.19 (0.38–3.89) | 0.54 (0.12–2.53) | ||
≥30 | 93 | 5 | 3.88 (1.04–14.48) | 4.34 (0.64–17.54) | ||
Family financial constraints | ||||||
No | 57 | 15 | Ref | <0.001 | Ref | 0.004 |
Yes | 127 | 6 | 5.57 (2.06–15.10) | 6.18 (1.80–21.22) | ||
Fertility-encouraged government policy | ||||||
No | 135 | 2 | Ref | <0.001 | Ref | <0.001 |
Yes | 49 | 19 | 0.04 (0.01–0.17) | 0.04 (0.01–0.19) | ||
Children's educational barriers | ||||||
No | 162 | 19 | Ref | 0.014 | Ref | 0.016 |
Yes | 22 | 2 | 3.47 (1.29–9.36) | 4.93 (1.34–18.14) |
aThe percentage of children expense (%) = 100% × Annual two children expense/Annual household income.
The sum does not necessarily equal the sample size for all variables because of missing data.
Pearson's χ2 test.