Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;13:808442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.808442

Table 2.

Results of the model-based estimated marginal means–pairwise comparisons between the pre-to-post differences of the three groups MBLM, MIN, and TAU.

Estimated marginal means
Pairwise comparisons
Dependent variable Group Mean difference (I-J) Std. error Sig. 95% Confidence interval for difference Effect size Cohen's d
I J Lower CI Upper CI
meanNN MBLM TAU 60.828 25.653 n.s. −2.244 123.899 0.75
MIN TAU 31.167 27.474 n.s. −36.383 98.717 0.39
sdNN MBLM TAU 4.011 3.438 n.s. −4.440 12.463 0.43
MIN TAU 0.981 3.682 n.s. −8.070 10.033 0.08
sdaNN5 MBLM TAU 7.237 4.293 n.s. −3.316 17.791 0.56
MIN TAU −0.697 4.597 n.s. −12.000 10.606 −0.05
RMSSD MBLM TAU 4.145 1.423 0.015 0.646 7.644 1.05
MIN TAU 2.255 1.524 n.s. −1.493 6.002 0.41
pNN50 MBLM TAU 0.013 0.006 n.s. −0.002 0.028 0.65
MIN TAU 0.008 0.007 n.s. −0.008 0.024 0.34
LF/HF MBLM TAU −0.074 1.477 n.s. −3.706 3.559 −0.01
MIN TAU 0.387 1.582 n.s. −3.504 4.277 0.08
SymDynRenyi4 MBLM TAU 0.24 0.086 0.021 0.029 0.452 0.86
MIN TAU 0.135 0.092 n.s. −0.091 0.361 0.43

Based on estimated marginal means. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Sidak.