TABLE 4.
Treatment results of BCVA grouped by baseline OCT biomarker status.
| Percentage of eyes with BCVA improvement |
Final BCVA response (Δ LogMAR, mean ± SD) |
|||
| Baseline biomarker | (+) | (–) | (+) | (–) |
| DRIL | 24/51 (47.1%) | 9/13 (69.2%) | –0.11 ± 0.43 | –0.22 ± 0.21 |
| ERM | 19/35 (54.3%) | 14/29 (48.3%) | –0.12 ± 0.43 | –0.15 ± 0.35 |
| EZD | 17/34 (50.0%) | 16/30 (53.3%) | –0.20 ± 0.44 | –0.06 ± 0.33 |
| HE | 24/46 (52.2%) | 9/18 (50.0%) | –0.14 ± 0.43 | –0.11 ± 0.28 |
| HRF | 32/59 (54.2%) | 1/5 (20.0%) | –0.15 ± 0.41 | –0.00 ± 0.06 |
| IRC | 28/53 (52.8%) | 5/11 (45.5%) | –0.14 ± 0.43 | –0.09 ± 0.16 |
| LONLC | 9/20 (45.0%) | 24/44 (54.5%) | –0.14 ± 0.52 | –0.13 ± 0.33 |
| SRF | 6/15 (40.0%) | 27/49 (55.1%) | –0.16 ± 0.44 | –0.13 ± 0.38 |
| VMI | 6/16 (37.5%) | 27/48 (56.3%) | –0.09 ± 0.33 | –0.15 ± 0.41 |
Comparing positive baseline biomarker status to negative baseline biomarker status, by Chi-Square and Student t-test.