Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 11;19:101145. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101145

Table 3.

Relative risk estimations of ACE scores for U.S. regions.

Region Relative risk estimations Comparisons of ACE scores
1 vs. 0 2 vs.0 3 vs.0 4+ s.0
Midwest vs. Northeast Odds ratio 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8
95% CI 0.8–1.3 0.6–1.2 0.5–1.2 0.5–1.4
p-value 0.90 0.38 0.22 0.51
South vs. Northeast Odds ratio 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5
95% CI 0.7–1.1 0.5–1.0 0.3–0.8 0.3–0.9
p-value 0.25 0.05 0.004 0.02
West vs. Northeast Odds ratio 0.9 1.2 0.9 0.8
95% CI 0.7–1.2 0.7–1.9 0.6–1.4 0.4–1.5
p-value 0.59 0.50 0.65 0.53

Note:*These odds ratios were estimated by a survey-based logistic regression model using ACE score as the dependent variable and region as the main effect after the model was adjusted by sociodemographics, including sex, race/ethnicity, education level, frequency of receiving public support/welfare, and childhood residential urbanity (the control group or level was set as female, White, never went to college, never received welfare, and rural residence, respectively).