Table 3.
Relative risk estimations of ACE scores for U.S. regions.
| Region | Relative risk estimations | Comparisons of ACE scores |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 vs. 0 | 2 vs.0 | 3 vs.0 | 4+ s.0 | ||
| Midwest vs. Northeast | Odds ratio | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 95% CI | 0.8–1.3 | 0.6–1.2 | 0.5–1.2 | 0.5–1.4 | |
| p-value | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.51 | |
| South vs. Northeast | Odds ratio | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 95% CI | 0.7–1.1 | 0.5–1.0 | 0.3–0.8 | 0.3–0.9 | |
| p-value | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.02 | |
| West vs. Northeast | Odds ratio | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 95% CI | 0.7–1.2 | 0.7–1.9 | 0.6–1.4 | 0.4–1.5 | |
| p-value | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.53 | |
Note:*These odds ratios were estimated by a survey-based logistic regression model using ACE score as the dependent variable and region as the main effect after the model was adjusted by sociodemographics, including sex, race/ethnicity, education level, frequency of receiving public support/welfare, and childhood residential urbanity (the control group or level was set as female, White, never went to college, never received welfare, and rural residence, respectively).