Table 1.
Comparison of different exosome isolation techniques.
| Isolation technique | Underlying mechanism | Working scalability | Sample purity | Advantage | Disadvantage | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymer co-precipitation | Hydrophobicity of protein and lipid | Small | Low | Cheap, fast, easy | Contaminated by co-precipitated particles | (52) |
| Affinity-based isolation | Affinity | Small | High | Fast, easy | Expensive, contaminated by microvesicles | (53) |
| Ultrafiltration | Molecular weight | Medium | Medium to high | Fast, easy | Plugged up easily by vesicles | (54, 55) |
| Size exclusion chromatography | Size and molecular weight | Flexible | High | Cheap, easy, reproducible | Time-consuming | (56, 57) |
| Immunoaffinity capture | Immunoaffinity-antibody | Small | High | Fast, easy | Expensive, contaminated by magnetic beads | (58) |
| Immunoaffinity-aptamer | Small | High | Cheap, fast, easy | Low recovery | (3, 59) | |
| Ultracentrifugation | Differential density | Flexible | Medium | Well-established and commonly used | Time-consuming, ultraspeed centrifuge required | (49, 50) |