Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;10:893579. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.893579

Table 2.

Liver ultrasound, enzymes, transient elastography and controlled attenuation parameter results.

PHIV n = 110 HEU
n = 36
HU n = 69 P-value
overall
P-value
PHIV vs. HEU
P-value
HEU vs. HU
TE and CAP [Median (IQR)]
Liver stiffness (kPa) 5.0 (4.4–5.9) 5.1 (4.6–6.1) 5.1 (4.5–5.8) 0.4 0.2 0.2
Liver fibrosis (>7kPa) 8 (7%) 2 (6%) 1 (1%) 0.2 1.0 0.3
CAP (dB/m) 195 (173–223) 171 (157–197) 186 (160–212) 0.01 0.004 0.3
Hepatic steatosis (>248dB/m) 10 (9%) 1 (3%) 1 (1%) 0.08 0.3 0.6
CAP (dB/m) in lean children 190 (173–223) 171 (158–195) 182 (157–203) 0.003 0.2 0.3
Liver enzymes and biomarkers [Median (IQR)]
ALT (U/L) 15 (12–20) 13 (10–15) 12 (10–15) 0.0001 0.002 0.3
Raised ALT 11 (10%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0.008 0.3 0.3
AST (U/L) 24 (21–29) 22 (19–27) 22 (18–24) 0.07 0.3 0.2
APRI 0.20 (0.16–0.23) 0.19 (0.15–0.22) 0.17 (0.15–0.23) 0.8 0.7 0.8-
Raised APRI 2 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.7 1.0 0.4
FIB-4 0.07 (0.05–0.08) 0.07 (0.06–0.09) 0.08 (0.06–0.10) 0.3 0.2
Liver sonar–hepatic steatosis grade n = 31 n = 15 n = 34
0 11 (36%) 7 (47%) 25 (74%) 0.009 0.2 0.09
1 19 (61%) 6 (40%) 8 (24%)
2 1 (3%) 2 (13%) 1 (3%)
3 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)