Table 3.
Two‐tailed partial correlations examining the associations between emotional responses to mealtimes and child feeding practices when controlling for both anxiety and depression among mothers of young children (N = 186)
| MEM‐P Efficacy | MEM‐P Anxiety | MEM‐P Stress and Anger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | |||
| CFPQ Child control | −0.06 | 0.15* | 0.01 |
| CFPQ Environment | 0.20** | 0.03 | −0.09 |
| CFPQ Modelling | 0.26*** | 0.10 | 0.01 |
| CFPQ Monitoring | 0.10 | 0.04 | −0.01 |
| Coercive control | |||
| CFPQ Emotion regulation | −0.16* | 0.08 | 0.16* |
| CFPQ Food as reward | −0.11 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| CFPQ Pressure | −0.00 | −0.06 | 0.09 |
| CFPQ Restriction for health | −0.13 | −0.05 | −0.01 |
| CFPQ Restriction for weight control | −0.04 | −0.02 | −0.04 |
| Autonomy promotion | |||
| CFPQ Encourage balance and variety | 0.16* | −0.12 | −0.19** |
| CFPQ Involvement | 0.19** | −0.15* | −0.07 |
| CFPQ Teaching about nutrition | 0.18* | −0.02 | −0.10 |
Abbreviations: CFPQ, Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire; MEM‐P, Mealtime Emotions Measure for Parents.
p ≤ 0.05
p ≤ 0.01
p ≤ 0.001.