Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;13:910764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910764

Table 3.

Analysis of the differences in coping styles of university students on the gender dimension.

Dimensions of the easy response approach Gender t-value
Male (N = 217) Female (N = 172)
Active response 1.4189 ± 0.34819 1.7189 ± 0.51203 −3.749
Negative response 1.1743 ± 0.81432 1.0175 ± 0.41861 1.207