Skip to main content
. 2022 May 25;6(6):434–440. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12773

Table 5.

Studies evaluating the high‐risk group predictive ability of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) 2011, ASGE 2019, and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines for common bile duct (CBD) stones

n (%)
Study (ref number) (n = number of patients) CBD stone prevalence High‐risk prevalence Stones in high‐risk patients Sens. Spec. PPV LHR+ (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
ASGE 2011
Adams et al. 27 (n = 498) 210 (42.2) 179 (35.9) 99 (55.3) 47.4 73.0 55.3 1.70 (1.34–2.15) 0.60 (0.55–0.64)
He et al. 28 (n = 2724) 1076 (39.5) 1171 (43.0) 750 (64.1) 69.7 74.5 64.0 2.73 (2.49–2.99) 0.72 (0.70–0.74)
Jacob et al. 13 (n = 267) 192 (71.9) 165 (61.8) 131 (79.4) 68.2 54.7 79.4 1.51 (1.15–1.96) 0.61 (0.55–0.68)
Kuzu et al. 26 (n = 888) 704 (79.3) 550 (61.9) 477 (86.7) 67.8 60.3 86.7 1.71 (1.42–2.06) 0.64 (0.60–0.68)
Magalhaes et al. 24 (n = 268) 179 (66.8) 193 (72.0) 154 (79.8) 86.0 56.2 79.8 1.96 (1.54–2.50) 0.71 (0.65–0.77)
Rubin et al. 25 (n = 521) 293 (56.2) 264 (50.7) 189 (71.6) 64.5 67.1 71.6 1.96 (1.60–2.40) 0.66 (0.62–0.70)
ASGE 2019
Jacob et al. 13 (n = 267) 192 (71.9) 86 (32.2) 71 (82.6) 37.0 80.0 82.6 1.85 (1.13–3.01) 0.58 (0.53–0.64)
Jagtap et al. 14 (n = 1042) 276 (26.5) 230 (22.1) 206 (89.6) 74.6 96.9 89.6 23.82 (15.97–35.53) 0.86 (0.83–0.88)
Lei et al. 15 (n = 879) 622 (70.8) 472 (53.7) 370 (78.4) 59.5 60.3 78.4 1.50 (1.27–1.77) 0.60 (0.56–0.63)
Current study (n = 521) 318 (61.0) 363 (69.7) 267 (73.6) 84.0 52.7 73.6 1.78 (1.52–2.07) 0.68 a (0.64–0.72)
ESGE
Jagtap et al. 14 (n = 1042) 276 (26.5) 213 (20.4) 205 (96.2) 74.3 99.0 96.2 71.12 (35.57–142.19) 0.87 (0.84–0.89)
Lei et al. 15 (n = 879) 622 (70.8) 338 (38.5) 288 (85.2) 46.3 80.5 85.2 2.38 (1.83–3.10) 0.63 (0.60–0.67)
Current study (n = 521) 318 (61.0) 342 (65.6) 252 (73.7) 79.2 55.7 73.7 1.79 (1.52–2.11) 0.67 a (0.63–0.72)
a

AUC specific to the high‐risk group.

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; LHR+, positive likelihood ratio; PPV, positive predictive value; Sens., sensitivity; Spec., specificity.