Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;13:897161. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.897161

Table 1.

Contingency table comparing epidemiological clustering (A–H) vs. WGS clustering (I–XI) as the reference method.

WGS clustering
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI S Total
Epidemiological clustering A 2 2 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 1 2 2 3 9
E 1 3 4 8
F 2 1 1 4
G 1 4 1 6
H 2 1 1 4
S 4 2 2 1 2 12 23
Total 16 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 3 21 63

S, Singleton.