TABLE 3.

Comparison between the catalytic capacity of some catalysts in this work ^a .

Entry	Catalyst	Conditions	Time/yield (%)	References
1	Glycine	H2O, sonication	9 min/94	Datta and Pasha, (2012)
2	Mesolite	EtOH, reflux	30 min/93	Pawar et al. (2018)
3	Potassium phthalimide	H2O, reflux	12 min/94	Dekamin and Eslami, (2014)
4	MgFe2O4NPs	EtOH, 65°C	12 min/74	Eshtehardian et al. (2020)
5	POM@Dy-PDA	EtOH/H2O, reflux	15 min/95	Hosseinzadeh-Baghan et al. (2020)
6	P4VPy-CuI	H2O, reflux	15 min/94	Albadi and Mansournezhad, (2016)
7	Nanozeolite clinoptilolite	H2O, reflux	15 min/92	Baghbanian et al. (2013)
8	WELFSA	H2O, rt	1.5h/88	Kantharaju and Khatavi, (2018)
9	Tungstic acid functionalized SBA-15	H2O, 100°C	12 min/86	Kundu et al. (2013)
10	MIL-101(Cr)-SO3H	H2O, 100°C	180 min/82	Saikia and Saikia, (2016)
11	[Et2NH(CH2)2CO2H][AcO]	Solvent free, 60°C	12 min/92	Shaikh et al. (2019)
12	{[4,4′-BPyH][C(CN)3]2}	Solvent free, 80°C	15 min/90	Zolfigol et al. (2016)
13	DBU	EtOH,MW, 50°C	3 min/94	Raghuvanshi and Singh, (2010)
14	Hydrotalcite	H2O, 60°C	4 h/95	Kale et al. (2013)
15	Na 2 eosin Y	Visible light irradiation, H 2 O/EtOH (2:1), rt	5 min/93	This work

^aBased on the three-component reaction of benzaldehyde, malononitrile, and resorcinol. Bold values provides optimal conditions for reaction.