Table 4.
Comparison of RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST
Response in target lesions | RECIST 1.1 | mRECIST |
---|---|---|
Complete response | Disappearance of all target lesions | Disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions |
| ||
Partial response | At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the diameters of the target lesions | At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as the reference the baseline sum of the diameters of the target lesions |
| ||
Stable disease | Any case that did not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease | Any case that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease |
| ||
Progressive disease | An increase ≥20% in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as the reference the smallest sum of the diameters of the target lesions recorded since treatment started | An increase of ≥20% in the sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as the reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since treatment started |
Lymph nodes identified as target lesions should always have the actual short-axis measurement recorded.