Table 2.
Study | Setting and gender | Baseline participants | Study type | Dietary assessment | Study details | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joh et al. (20) | United States of America Female | Nurse's Health Study II. 33,106 women included. Inclusion criteria: Women with completed High School FFQ and underwent at least 1 lower gastrointestinal endoscopy between 1999 and 2015. Exclusion Criteria: No lower bowel endoscopy during follow-up, history of cancer except non-melanoma skin cancer, colorectal polyps, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis before the return of the HS-FFQ, missing data, implausible energy intake. |
Prospective Cohort Study | 124 item HS-FFQ for participants diet from age 13–18. Questions asked how often on average a standard portion size of each item was consumed. 9 possible responses. | Primary study outcome: colorectal adenoma Total fructose = sum of free fructose and half sucrose intake. Total glucose = sum of free glucose and half sucrose intake. Added sugar = sugar added during processing/preparation. Western diet pattern = high intake of dessert, sweets, snacks, red and processed meat, refined grains. Prudent diet = high intake of vegetables, fruits, better quality grains, fish, poultry. | Per 1 serving/day higher SSB intake and risk of high risk adenomas: OR = OR = 1.34, CI = 1.01–1.79, p = 0.044. (Per 5% of calories) higher total fructose intake during adolescence and risk of high risk adenomas: OR = 1.30, CI = 1.06–1.60, p = 0.012. <1.3 fruit servings/day during adolescence and risk: OR = 1.51, CI = 1.26–1.82, p < 0.001 (for total fructose) OR = 1.34, CI = 1.12–1.60, p = 0.028 (for SSB). |
Molmenti et al. (23) | Phoenix, Arizona Male and female | Men and Women recruited from 1990 to 1999 Wheat Bran Fiber and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Phase III chemoprevention trials 1,623 participants included Inclusion criteria: 40–80 years old with 1+ colorectal adenoma removed during colonoscopy evaluation within 6 month period prior to study registration. Exclusion: self-reported inherited syndromes. |
Prospective Cohort Study | Dietary intake assessed using Arizona FFQ to evaluate dietary intake over the past few months in the previous year. Energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index scores derived from FFQ. |
Primary study outcome: metachronous colorectal adenoma (characterized as advanced or non-advanced) | Men and women < 50 YO with colorectal adenomas had a higher intake of protein (p = 0.03), total fat (p < 0.00) monounsaturated fat (p = 0.001), polyunsaturated fat (p = 0.049), red meat (p = 0.001) and more pro-inflammatory diet (p < 0.001) than those over 50. < 50 YO red meat consumption > 511 g/week and adenoma risk: OR = 0.84, CI = 0.233–3.021, p = 0.79. |
Zheng et al. (22) | United States of America Female | Nurse's Health Study II 29,474 women included. Inclusion criteria: Undergone at least 1 lower endoscopy before 2011, younger than 50. Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, previous history of colorectal polyps, missing data, implausible energy intake |
Prospective Cohort Study | FFQ categorized into 40 groups and factor analysis derived scores for either Western or Prudent dietary pattern Derived DASH diet, Alternative Mediterranean diet, Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores (DASH 8–40; AMED 0–9; AHEI-2010 0–110). |
Cases: confirmed newly diagnosed colorectal adenoma. Non-cases: Lower endoscopy with no adenomas. Primary analysis: associations between diet quality and risk of early-onset adenoma overall and according to high vs. low risk. Secondary analysis: association by location/size/histology; evaluated associations according to malignant potential in 2 logistic regressions using same reference group. | Highest quintile for the Western diet and risk of early-onset adenomas: OR = 1.67, CI = 1.18–2.37, p = 0.01. Risk and DASH diet score: OR = 0.65, CI = 0.45–0.93, p = 0.009, AMED score: OR = 0.55, CI = 0.38–0.79, p = 0.007, Prudent score: OR = 0.69, CI = 0.48–0.98, p = 0.03, and AHEI-2010: OR = 0.71, CI = 0.51–1.01, p = 0.01. Risk of adenomas in the distal colon and rectum for Western Diet: OR = 1.65, CI = 1.14–2.38, p = 0.01, Prudent: OR = 0.68, CI = 0.47–0.99, p = 0.04, DASH: OR = 0.63, CI = 0.42–0.94, p = 0.01, AHEI-2010: OR = 0.71, CI = 0.49–1.03, p = 0.02. |
Nguyen et al. (21) | United States of America Female | Nurse's Health Study II 30,818 women included. Inclusion criteria: undergone at least 1 lower endoscopy before the end of follow-up and were younger than 50. Exclusion criteria: CRC or IBD before baseline and before each biennial follow-up, prior history of colorectal neoplasia/polyps, implausible energy intake, missing diet intake. |
Prospective Cohort Study | FFQ every 4 years from 1991 (130 food items); 1998 gave HS-FFQ (124 food items) Previous study (Nguyen, Ma, Wang) identified 43 different sulfur-metabolizing bacterial species and foods were categorized as such: processed meats, liquor, low-calorie drinks positively associated with enrichment of bacteria; beer, fruit juice, legumes, vegetables, sweets are negatively associated with bacteria. |
Primary endpoint was colorectal adenoma or serrated polyp diagnosed before age 50 Cases: had colorectal adenoma Non-cases: no adenoma Scored by summing the intake of putative foods weighed by their regression coefficients. Cumulative average of all sulfur microbial diet scores available from 1991- 2 year questionnaire cycle before most recent endoscopy calculated. | Highest quartile of sulfur microbial diets and risk of early-onset adenomas: OR = 1.13, CI = 1.10–1.56, p = 0.02. Association with high sulfur microbial diet and adenomas in the proximal colon: OR = 1.58, CI = 1.17–2.14, p = 0.01 and tubulovillous/villous histology: OR = 1.65, CI = 1.12–2.43, p = 0.04. |