Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 4;2015(9):CD009106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009106.pub2

Comparison 3. Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) with team training versus SFNRT.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Teamwork behaviour 2   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Any teamwork behaviour 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.41 [1.72, 3.11]
1.2 Information sharing 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.55, 1.13]
1.3 Inquiry 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.15, 0.43]
1.4 Assertion 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.33, 1.03]
1.5 Teaching or advising 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.08 [‐0.01, 0.16]
1.6 Managing workload 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 9.93 [6.14, 13.73]
1.7 Vigilance 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [‐0.13, 0.53]
2 Neonatal resuscitation training performance scores 1 98 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.40 [‐2.02, 4.82]
3 Resuscitation duration (seconds) 2 130 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐149.54 [‐214.73, ‐84.34]